Tuesday, November 3, 2020

Christ's Example

 

Christ’s Example

Taken from the book,
Behold Mine Eyes Have Seen Thy Salvation

“After that, He poured water into a basin and began to wash His disciples’ feet, drying them with the towel that was wrapped around Him. He came to Simon Peter, who said to Him, ‘Lord, are You going to wash my feet?’ Jesus replied, ‘You do not realize now what I am doing, but later you will understand.’ ‘No,’ said Peter, ‘You shall never wash my feet.’ Jesus answered, ‘Unless I wash you, you have no part with Me.’…When He had finished washing their feet, He put on His clothes and returned to His place. ‘Do you understand what I have done for you?’ He asked them. ‘You call Me “Teacher” and “Lord,” and rightly so, for that is what I am. Now that I, your Lord and Teacher, have washed your feet, you also should wash one another’s feet. I have set you an example that you should do as I have done for you.’ ”

JOHN 13:5-8; 12-15 NIV

People get uncomfortable around Jesus because He doesn’t fit into the way they see things, plan things, and do things. With our natural minds, we can never really understand what Jesus is all about. When we place Him next to our human plumb lines, He appears to be on a slant to the way we function; when we put a level next to Him, He looks out of balance to the way we react; when we put a ruler on Him, He doesn’t seem to measure up to the way we go about our business. Jesus’ entire life has been an enigma to many. The natural mind asks, “How could a prince be born outside a palace, a teacher have no degree, a king have no army, a ruler have no place to lay his head, and a miracle worker be unable to come down from a cross?”

When we see the way that Jesus responded to His disciples as they gathered for the Passover, we are once again amazed at His behavior. Even Peter could not fully grasp it. Peter saw himself as the follower, and Jesus as the Master. “Why” he questioned, “would my Master take the place of a slave and wash my feet?” Peter had been with Jesus for more than three years but still had many things to learn. As Jesus washed the disciples’ feet, He was doing far more than teaching them a lesson in humility; He was demonstrating to them what was at the heart of the Kingdom of God. The message of the Kingdom is that every follower of Jesus Christ carries a towel and washbasin with him into every circumstance and relationship in life. Jesus showed us that the Kingdom of God is “upside down” to the way the world operates.

In the Kingdom of God…
…a person is lifted up by humbling himself, not by exalting himself in the eyes of others.
…strength is found through weakness, not by being confident in your own abilities.
…fullness comes by becoming empty, not by running after pleasure.
…life is gained by losing it, not by looking out for “number one.”
…riches come by giving them away, not by storing them up.
…greatness comes by becoming a servant, not by seeking power and celebrity.

By Paul Lessin

Notes on Angels

 

Angels

 

 (Latin angelus; Greek aggelos; from the Hebrew for "one going" or "one sent"; messenger). The word is used in Hebrew to denote either a divine or human messenger.   It is the spirit-messenger

 

      The angels are represented throughout the Bible as a body of spiritual beings intermediate between God and men: "You have made him (man) a little less than the angels" (Psalm 8:6) They are spirits; the writer of the Epistle to the Hebrews says: "Are they not all ministering spirits, sent to minister to them who shall receive the inheritance of salvation?" (Heb. I, 14).

 

 Attendants at God's throne it is as messengers that they most often figure in the Bible.

 

 This function of the angelic host is expressed by the word "assistance" (Job, i, 6: ii, 1), and our More than once we are told of seven angels whose special function it is thus to "stand before God's throne" The same thought may be intended by "the angel of His presence"  

 

 God's messengers to mankind

 

 ‘These glimpses of life beyond the veil are only occasional’. The angels of the Bible generally appear in the role of God's messengers to mankind. They are His instruments by whom He communicates His will to men, and in Jacob's vision they are depicted as ascending and descending the ladder which stretches from earth to heaven while the Eternal Father gazes upon the wanderer below. It was an angel who found Agar in the wilderness (Gen., xvi); angels drew Lot out of Sodom; an angel announces to Gideon that he is to save his people; an angel foretells the birth of Samson (Judges, xiii), and the angel Gabriel instructs Daniel (Dan.,viii, 16), though he is not called an angel in either of these passages, but "the man Gabriel" (9:21). The same heavenly spirit announced the birth of St. John the Baptist and the Incarnation of the Redeemer, while tradition ascribes to him both the message to the shepherds (Luke, ii, 9), and the most glorious mission of all, that of strengthening the King of Angels in His Agony (Luke 22:43). The spiritual nature of the angels is manifested very clearly in the account, which Zacharias gives of the revelations bestowed upon him by the ministry of an angel. The prophet depicts the angel as speaking "in him". He seems to imply that he was

 Conscious of an interior voice, which was not that of God but of His messenger. 

 

 Such appearances of angels generally last only so long as the delivery of their message

 Requires, but frequently their mission is prolonged, and they are represented as the constituted guardians of the nations at some particular crisis, e.g. during the Exodus

 9

 

 

 Personal guardians

 

 Throughout the Bible we find it repeatedly implied that each individual soul has its tutelary angel. Thus Abraham, when sending his steward to seek a wife for Isaac, says: "He will send His angel before thee" (Genesis 24:7). The words of the ninetieth Psalm which the devil quoted to our Lord (Matt., iv, 6) are well known, and Judith accounts for her heroic deed by saying: "As the Lord liveth, His angel hath been my keeper" (xiii, 20).

   St. Jerome in his commentary on the above words of our Lord says: "The dignity of a soul is so great, that each has a guardian angel from its birth." The general doctrine that the angels are our appointed guardians is considered to be a point of faith, but that each individual member of the human race has his own individual guardian angel is not of faith (de fide); the view has, however, such strong support from the Doctors of the Church that it would be rash to deny it.

 

 

 

 Hierarchical organization

 

After Adam's fall Paradise is guarded against our First Parents by cherubim who are clearly God's ministers, though nothing is said of their nature. St. Paul has furnished us with two other lists of names of the heavenly cohorts. He tells us (Ephes., i, 21) that Christ is raised up "above all principality, and power, and virtue, and dominion"; and, writing to the Colossians he says: "In Him were all things created in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominations, or principalities or powers." It is to be noted that he uses two of these names of the powers of darkness when (ii, 15) he talks of Christ as "despoiling the principalities and powers . . . triumphing over them in Himself". And it is not a little remarkable those only two verses later he warns his readers not to be seduced into any "religion of angels". He seems to put his seal upon a certain lawful angelology. We have a hint of such excesses in the Book of Enoch, wherein, as already stated, the angels play a quite disproportionate part. Similarly Josephus tells us (Be. Jud. II, viii, 7) that the Essences had to take a vow to preserve the names of the angels.  We have already seen how (Daniel 10:12-21) various districts are allotted to various angels who are termed their princes, and the same feature reappears still more markedly in the Apocalyptic "angels of the seven churches", though it is impossible to decide what is the precise signification of the term. These seven Angels of the Churches are generally regarded as being the Bishops occupying these sees.

 

 The treatise "De Coelesti Hierarchia", which is ascribed to St. Denis the Areopagite, and which exercised so strong an influence upon the Scholastics, treats at great length of the hierarchies and orders of the angels. It is generally conceded that this work was not due to St.Denis, but must date some centuries later. Though the doctrine it contains regarding the choirs of angels has been received in the Church with extraordinary unanimity, no proposition touching the angelic hierarchies is binding on our faith. The following passages from St. Gregory the Great will give us a clear idea of the view of the Church's doctors on the point:

 

  We know on the authority of Scripture that there are nine orders of angels,

      Angels, Archangels, Virtues, Powers, Principalities, Dominations, Throne,

      Cherubim and Seraphim. That there are Angels and Archangels nearly every

      Page of the Bible tell us, and the books of the Prophets talk of Cherubim and

      Seraphim. St. Paul, too, writing to the Ephesians enumerates four orders when

      He says: 'above all Principality, and Power, and Virtue, and Domination'; and

      Again, writing to the Colossians he says: 'whether Thrones, or Dominations, or

      Principalities, or Powers'.

 

 St. Thomas (Summa Theologica I:108), following St. Denis (De Coelesti Hierarchia, vi, vii), divides the angels into three hierarchies each of which contains three orders. Their proximity to the Supreme Being serves as the basis of this division. In the first hierarchy he places the Seraphim, Cherubim, and Thrones; in the second, the Dominations, Virtues, and Powers; in the third, the Principalities, Archangels, and Angels. The only Scriptural names furnished of individual angels are Raphael, Michael, and Gabriel, names, which signify their respective attributes. Apocryphal Jewish books, such as the Book of Enoch, supply those of Uriel and Jeremiel, while many are found in other apocryphal sources, like those Milton names in "Paradise Lost".

 

 The number of angels

 

 The number of the angels is frequently stated as prodigious (Daniel 7:10; Apocalypse 5:11; Psalm 67:18; Matthew 26:53). From the use of the word host (sabaoth) as a synonym for the heavenly army it is hard to resist the impression that the term "Lord of Hosts" refers to God's Supreme command of the angelic multitude (cf. Deuteronomy 33:2; 32:43; Septuagint).

 

 

 The evil angels

 

 The distinction of good and bad angels constantly appears in the Bible, but it is instructive to note that there is no sign of any dualism or conflict between two equal principles, one good and the other evil. The conflict depicted is rather that waged on earth between the Kingdom of God and the Kingdom of the Evil One, but the latter's inferiority is always supposed. The existence, then, of this inferior, and therefore created, spirit, has to be explained. The gradual development of Hebrew consciousness on this point is very clearly marked in the inspired writings. The account of the fall of our First Parents (Gen., iii) is couched in such terms that it is impossible to see in it anything more than the acknowledgment of the existence of a principle of evil that was jealous of the human race.  It should moreover be noted that the Hebrew word nephilim rendered gigantes, in 6:4, may mean "fallen ones". The Fathers generally refer it to the sons of Seth.

 

 The picture afforded us in Job, i and ii, is equally imaginative; but Satan, perhaps the earliest individualization of the fallen Angel, is presented as an intruder who is jealous of Job.  In Job. iv, 18, we seem to find a definite declaration of the fall: "In His angels He found wickedness." The Septuagint of Job contains some instructive passages regarding avenging angels in whom we are perhaps to see fallen spirits. xxi, 15: "The riches unjustly accumulated shall be vomited up, an angel shall drag him out of his house;"

 

. In some of these passages, it is true; the angels may be regarded as avengers of God's justice without therefore being evil spirits.  In New Testament times the idea of the two spiritual kingdoms is clearly established. The devil is a fallen angel who in his fall has drawn multitudes of the heavenly host in his train. Our Lord terms him "the Prince of this world" (John xiv, 30); he is the tempter of the human race and tries to involve them in his fall. Christian imagery of the devil as the dragon is mainly derived from the Apocalypse (ix, 11-15; xii, 7-9), where he is termed "the angel of the bottomless pit", "the dragon", "the old serpent", etc., and is represented as having actually been in combat with Archangel Michael. The similarity between scenes such as these and the early Babylonian accounts of the struggle between Merodach and the dragon Tiamat is very striking.

 

rank is intended, as in Is., lxiii, 9 (cf. Tobias, xii, 15)? May not this be what is meant by "the angel of God" (cf. Num., xx, 16)?

 

 That a process of evolution in theological thought accompanied the gradual unfolding of God's revelation need hardly be said.

Incarnation; as the Word of God the sublime character in which He is one day to reveal Himself to men.

 

 But the great Latins, St. Jerome, St. Augustine, and St. Gregory the Great, held the clearly styles Christ the 'Angel of great Counsel.'"   He concludes: "It is the name of the indweller, not of the temple."

 

Angels In Babylonian Literature

 

 The Bible has shown us that a belief in angels, or spirits intermediate between God and man, is a characteristic of the Semitic people. It is therefore interesting to trace this belief in the Semites of Babylonia. According to Sayce (The Religions of Ancient Egypt and Babylonia, Gifford Lectures, 1901), the engrafting of Semitic beliefs on the earliest Sumerian religion of Babylonia is marked by the entrance of angels or sukallin in their theosophy. Thus we find an interesting parallel to "the angels of the Lord" in Nebo, "the minister of Merodach" (ibid. 355). He is also termed the "angel" or interpreter of the will or Merodach (ibid., 456),

 

  Suffice it to say that not everything in the Bible is revelation, and that the object of the inspired writings is not merely to tell us new truths but also to make clearer certain truths taught us by nature. The modern view, which tends to regard everything Babylonian as absolutely primitive and which seems to think that because critics affix a late date to the Biblical writings the religion therein contained must also be late, may be seen in Haag,"Theologie Biblique" (339). This writer sees in the Biblical angels only primitive deities debased into demi-gods by the triumphant progress of Monotheism.

 

Some notes on the common angels:

 

Each Archangel has legions of angles to answer his call. Angels can be looked upon as those who endeavor to awaken our inner consciousness.

The term angel is a term used to describe all dwellers of heaven.

 

Archangel Michael – ‘Who is like God’ – ‘ the great Prince’, ‘ Above all’. He is known as the Defender of all of God’s people. Scripture tells us is Michael who kicked Lucifer and his rebellious fallen angels our of heaven. All sacred scriptures recognize Michael. It is Michael who is believed to have rescued Daniel from the lion’s den and also appeared as the fire of the burning bush to Moses.

 

Archangel Gabriel – God’s spiritual messenger who brings good news. It was Gabriel who informed the Virgin Mary that she would bring forth a son and would call him the name Jesus. It was Gabriel is the messenger angel who appeared and brought a revelation to Muhammad on the “Night of the Power and Glory”. In Islam Gabriel is the Angel of Humanity.

 

Archangel Raphael – Known as the divine healer, interested in God’s pilgrim travelers, his names means God Has Healed. This high archangel is responsible for the healing of the earth

 

Archangel Uriel – His name means the “Light of God” According to the Book of Enoch id was Uriel who was sent by God to warn Noah of the impending flood. One of his many titles is Preside Over Hades; another is The Archangel of Salvation.

 

“All that I have seen teaches me to trust the creator for all I have not seen” – Ralph Waldo Emerson

 

 

 

A few Brief Summaries of some Christian Classics

 

A few  Brief Summaries of some Christian Classics

 

The Desert Fathers – 4thC AD

Were hermits, ascetics who lived a few centuries after Christ, in the desert region of Egypt from the 3 Century onwards?

Rejecting worldly pleasures and instead seeks a closer relationship with God/

The basic idea of the Desert Fathers - “we can ascend to God through a mixture of self-emphasis on the ascetic life. Jesus said “deny yourself, take of the cross and follow me. This they took very seriously.

 

City of GodSt Augustine - 5th C

Many writers at that time were attempting to harmonize Christian ideas with Platonism – to merge Reason and Faith to produce a “Reasonable Faith” to provide a rational foundation for the mystical and theological aspects of Christian, Jewish or later Islamic beliefs. He viewed Evil as simply the absence of the Good. He rejected the idea of the dualism of Good and Evil. He contrasted the City Of Man with the City of God. “We are all seeking to build a City of God, out of the City of Man, where man’s innate weakness is overcome through faith in God.”

 

 

The Cloud of Unknowing – 14th C – Unknown Author

The main idea is that we can only approach God through love, not through knowledge and rational thought. The book describes the human need to understand as a stumbling block en route to reaching God through simple Love. The book provides insight into medieval mysticism. It has a Zen-like view of Christianity. The book’s view was that despite any ‘image” of God we might conceive of, the true Nature of God lies beyond, that image or concept we can hold in our heads. Therefore we must have an imageless approach to the Divine Being. God is transcendent of rational thought therefore that leaves God “clouded in darkness to our rational minds”. There is an impossibility of the knowledge (intellectual) of God. God can only be approached by unconditional Love. The author suggests not conceptualizing God, advising us to reject extraneous thoughts, only to focus on the Love of God. Spinoza and others recognized the impossibility of the knowledge of God, as we can only work within the limits of our rationality. Kant eventually divided the world into noumena and phenomena. His argues that in trying to understand the nomena world (the world of things as they really are, rather them simply as we perceived them to be) we inevitably came up against the bounds of reason. Kierkegaard seizes on this idea and suggested that to approach God, we must take a “Leap of Faith”. (This book, as well as the City of God by St. Augustine, were two of the core books for a Philosophy of Religion course I took at UNBSJ in Saint John back in 1989. Without those courses I would not have been able to have converted to Faith in 2000.)

 

The Mirrors of Simple Souls – 14 Century – Marguerite Parere – Lived in Belgium

She was burned at the stake in 1310 after a trial in Paris for heresy. The book takes the form of a conversation between the personification of Love, Reason, and the Soul. The book talks about the 7 stages of spiritual growth one must go through on a journey to union with God.

 

It bears comparison with the later work of “Dark Night of the Soul” by St. John of the Cross and “The Interior Castle” by St. Teresa which also takes the reader through the metaphorical journey towards divinity. The path towards God is on where the soul, the ego, is eventually annihilated in the sense that the soul on longer wills in a selfish way but wants only what God wants. In this

 

 Union with the Devine, the self disappears leaving only God. She believes that one could have a personal relationship with God, the central authority of the Universe.  In fact that it was only through the church and not the individual, could one have a relationship with God. Even today Marguerite Parere was never been pardoned the RC Church for the ‘crime’ of writing her poetic, spiritual works on the oneness with God.

 

The Interior Castle – Written 1577 – Teresa of Avila.

In it she committed her inner life to prayer.  she writes passionately about the soul’s search for the soul’s mate. She would often talk of the journey that starts out in contemplation and prayer that leads to the subjugation of the personal will to the will of God. Describes the seven mansions in the interior castle of the soul.

 

Dark Night of the Soul – St. John of the Cross – 16th C

One of Spain’s best-beloved poems is the Dark Night of The Soul by St. John of the Cross. It is a short poem that gains a mystical account of the soul leaving the body and reaching up towards its “beloved”, God. It describes finding an ‘a secret ladder’ that brings you to a place where you find both peace and God. It was this poem that introduced into common language - “the Dark Night of the Soul”. In essence, this refers to the condition of despair that is felt by a believer who feels that his prayer is empty and unrewarding. Even though this love may feel unrequited, persisting in a life of virtue and prayer can lead us to a deeper understanding of that Love. In doing so we can recognize that we are that love of and from God and not limited to usual and base instinct of self-interest.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Our Total Depravity

 


 Reformed theology  This term is an integral part of John Calvin's theological framework known as Calvinism, which emphasizes the total depravity of man and the complete sovereignty of God. God's plan for the world and every soul that he has created is guided by his will, or providence. According to Calvin, the idea that man has free will and is able to make choices independently of what God has already determined is based on our limited understanding of God's perfection and the idea that God's purposes can be circumvented. In this mode of thought, providence is related to predestination. This concept remains prominent among many Protestant denominations that identify with Calvinism, the Reformed churches

Thursday, February 6, 2020

Developmental Arrests occurs when stuck in any and all Victimhood Identities - A very serious implication/impairment for overall Mental Health and Well-being




The Unbelieving woman spoke, “The journalist I was trying to call is writing a book about how important ranching families are in the West.  He wants to know both the upside and the dark side of our family. The size on these families is easy to tell.  He also was on the dark side.  I said I would talk if I could remain anonymous.  I was thrilled to have the opportunity to destroy my father’s image.  To grind my father’s reputation into dust.  What pleasure it would bring to know that I would have power over one who abused his power over us.
Did I tell you my husband asked for a divorce?
I'm meeting with the journalists next week.  Telling the truth will be healing, but it frightens me, so somehow, there must be another way.
The pastor replied, “There is another way, but only one way and that is forgiveness, of your Father.  She replied, “I refuse to forgive him for what he's done.  I’m bound and gagged by the rage I feel.  I want to be able to love again, to give and receive love and not sabotage it.  How can I ever forgive him for what he did to his children?
The pastor applied. I do understand my father had a relationship with another woman and 60 years later, I learned that I had a brother.  I will spare you the details but I was able to reap the fruits of this new relationship by forgiving my father.  Forgiving him was the path to loving my brother.  He went on, you are clearly depressed and I imagine that all your relationships have suffered, including those in your profession and now your marriage ending.  He went on further and said to her, “This isn’t about your Father “said the pastor, “this is about you.”
Confiding the dark side of the journalist won’t alleviate the hurt.  It will extend it, for you and countless others.  It's important to remember it will also dishonour the memory of your mother.
So let's drop the notion of humiliating your father and concentrate on yourself.
The Pastor then went on.  “In nearly five decades of working with human souls, I’ve seen how we can define ourselves by how we were wounded by others.   In every way, unforgiveness continues to make you the victim.
Surrender is the key that unlocks the hard heart and gives love the liberty to enter.  Where Love enters the possibilities for the forgiveness of others go viral.
She replied I will not surrender to my father or to God or you the Pastor, for that matter. 
Blasé Pascal, a brilliant mathematician, inventor, a philosopher once said, “There is a God-shaped vacuum in the heart of every person. It cannot be filled by any created or material thing.  It can only be filled by God made known through Jesus Christ.
At the age of 40, I was a priest who believed in the intellect but knew nothing of the intimacy with God that comes with surrender.
 I was certainly lost, holding onto my pain, trying to fill the God-shaped vacuum.   Then one day, standing in the backyard of the rectory, I was moved to pray a simple prayer from the heart.  I got down on my knees and prayed out loud to God, “I surrendered everything to you. From that moment on, everything changed.
Forgiveness has exactly the power to do what is intended.  It has the power to liberate ourselves.    To liberate us from the gridlock of our EGOS.  My simple prayer was, “Thank you God for sending your son to die for my sins.  I surrender completely and want to receive Christ as my Savior.  I am a child and I surrender my entire life to you.  There is always betrayal in our lives and then comes a crucifixion and after that, finally redemption.